<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[IRSE Exam Forum - 1999]]></title>
		<link>https://irse.signalpost.org/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[IRSE Exam Forum - https://irse.signalpost.org]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 15:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>MyBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[1999 Layout]]></title>
			<link>https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=65</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://irse.signalpost.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=16">steve</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=65</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Is it just me or is the stone terminal &copy; on the 1999 layout to short for a 400 metre freight train to fit in and get the loco to run round to the back. At the point where the loco would decouple (junction at the headshunt) the rear 100 metres or so would still be across the junction to the mainline, which would prevent the loco from re-attaching at the rear.<br />
<br />
If the loco draws the majority of the train onto the headshunt then a second loco waiting on the loco spur could attach to the rear and haul it out again. But even then it looks like the last couple of wagons wouldn't reach the bunker to load/unload. And is that a reasonable statement to make about the method of operation in the exam, ie having a loco sitting around not doing a great deal?<br />
<br />
Maybe I'm missing something, my knowledge of operational methods on these types of areas is pretty slim...I have attached a picture of the offending area.<br />
<br />
Any suggestions gratefully received.<br />
<br />
Steve.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Is it just me or is the stone terminal &copy; on the 1999 layout to short for a 400 metre freight train to fit in and get the loco to run round to the back. At the point where the loco would decouple (junction at the headshunt) the rear 100 metres or so would still be across the junction to the mainline, which would prevent the loco from re-attaching at the rear.<br />
<br />
If the loco draws the majority of the train onto the headshunt then a second loco waiting on the loco spur could attach to the rear and haul it out again. But even then it looks like the last couple of wagons wouldn't reach the bunker to load/unload. And is that a reasonable statement to make about the method of operation in the exam, ie having a loco sitting around not doing a great deal?<br />
<br />
Maybe I'm missing something, my knowledge of operational methods on these types of areas is pretty slim...I have attached a picture of the offending area.<br />
<br />
Any suggestions gratefully received.<br />
<br />
Steve.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>