<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[IRSE Exam Forum - 2008]]></title>
		<link>https://irse.signalpost.org/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[IRSE Exam Forum - https://irse.signalpost.org]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 12:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>MyBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[2008 mainline layout attempt]]></title>
			<link>https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=284</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 08:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://irse.signalpost.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=16">steve</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=284</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Well I went for a mostly 3 aspect design.<br />
<br />
I did consider OTW on the single track branch but thought that with the mixed bi-di traffic and levels of use, and more importantly the 1.5 hours exam time, I would stretch 3 aspects out along there too. It did seem to fit in quite well with the stations and junctions, though may be a bit pricey for some peoples taste.<br />
<br />
Any advance on that...? 4 aspect, ERTMS solutions...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well I went for a mostly 3 aspect design.<br />
<br />
I did consider OTW on the single track branch but thought that with the mixed bi-di traffic and levels of use, and more importantly the 1.5 hours exam time, I would stretch 3 aspects out along there too. It did seem to fit in quite well with the stations and junctions, though may be a bit pricey for some peoples taste.<br />
<br />
Any advance on that...? 4 aspect, ERTMS solutions...]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>