https://irse.signalpost.org/ Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:53:54 +0000 MyBB https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=478 Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:58:57 +0000 merlin89]]> https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=478 Thanks
Ian

---

Note these were done Prior to PJWs comments re the route CT 2002 layout so lessons learned not applied just yet]]> Thanks
Ian

---

Note these were done Prior to PJWs comments re the route CT 2002 layout so lessons learned not applied just yet]]> https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=288 Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:38:48 +0000 apparao_medapati]]> https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=288
I have tried 2001 layout for 204 Point.


In "swinging overlap requires" column for unconditional swing whether we have to prove all the routes which requires the overlap with sectional route released by track conditions.

The routes which leading to Down slow line have the facing point 204 in overlap.
In this case, there are no trailing points and track section beyond the facing point 204. Hence, in 'Swinging overlap requires column]]>
I have tried 2001 layout for 204 Point.


In "swinging overlap requires" column for unconditional swing whether we have to prove all the routes which requires the overlap with sectional route released by track conditions.

The routes which leading to Down slow line have the facing point 204 in overlap.
In this case, there are no trailing points and track section beyond the facing point 204. Hence, in 'Swinging overlap requires column]]>