https://irse.signalpost.org/ Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:53:55 +0000 MyBB https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=1807 Thu, 28 Aug 2014 09:14:30 +0000 jay.fitz]]> https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=1807 Comments appreciated.

JF]]> Comments appreciated.

JF]]> https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=1074 Sun, 23 Sep 2012 11:46:21 +0000 PJW]]> https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=1074 https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=633 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:38:45 +0000 Alasdair]]> https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=633
My attempt at the 2004 CT question. I would especially appreciate any comments about the table format - I'm desperately practising trying to do the things faster, so am aware I've left quite a bit of the detail off.

Many thanks

Alasdair]]>
My attempt at the 2004 CT question. I would especially appreciate any comments about the table format - I'm desperately practising trying to do the things faster, so am aware I've left quite a bit of the detail off.

Many thanks

Alasdair]]> https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=631 Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:02:16 +0000 priyman]]> https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=631
We had a study group and were failing to understand the points (detection) section of the control tables.

We determined that when you put down the points normal or reverse, the interlocking circuits would check point are set, locked and detected.

But in the box labled 'detected normal or reverse'; the check is that the route is set only when the points are detected? But isn't that repetition because you have already checked that they are set locked and detected?

I'll give you the example I'm thinking of 2004 paper - route 142B(M) requires;

Assuming this is a swinging overlap for sake of understanding;
I wrote:
212N, 211N, 207R, 206N,
(203N, 205R, 201N) or (203R, 202N).

Then I would enter 203 in the detection box as well.

But I see repetition, is there supposed to be this additional check (and if this was RRI - a double inclusion of relay contacts 203 RLR in the route locking circuitry) or am I misunderstanding something?

Any input would be welcomed,

thanks,

Priyank]]>
We had a study group and were failing to understand the points (detection) section of the control tables.

We determined that when you put down the points normal or reverse, the interlocking circuits would check point are set, locked and detected.

But in the box labled 'detected normal or reverse'; the check is that the route is set only when the points are detected? But isn't that repetition because you have already checked that they are set locked and detected?

I'll give you the example I'm thinking of 2004 paper - route 142B(M) requires;

Assuming this is a swinging overlap for sake of understanding;
I wrote:
212N, 211N, 207R, 206N,
(203N, 205R, 201N) or (203R, 202N).

Then I would enter 203 in the detection box as well.

But I see repetition, is there supposed to be this additional check (and if this was RRI - a double inclusion of relay contacts 203 RLR in the route locking circuitry) or am I misunderstanding something?

Any input would be welcomed,

thanks,

Priyank]]> https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=356 Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:47:41 +0000 interesting_signal]]> https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=356 https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=354 Sun, 14 Mar 2010 13:11:05 +0000 interesting_signal]]> https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=354 https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=350 Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:02:22 +0000 merlin89]]> https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=350 Cheers
Ian]]> Cheers
Ian]]> https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=344 Sun, 07 Mar 2010 21:08:16 +0000 interesting_signal]]> https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=344 https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=335 Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:50:50 +0000 PJW]]> https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=335 However unless you are on a Network Rail computer then you will be likely to find that it appears currupt as you need a specific font - indeed that problem may exist on the Stidy Pack DVD
[Drat- I should have remembered this when selecting the paper to do!!]

I have now posted a scan of a paper copy of the layout which hopefully is a decent compromise between file size and resolution]]> However unless you are on a Network Rail computer then you will be likely to find that it appears currupt as you need a specific font - indeed that problem may exist on the Stidy Pack DVD
[Drat- I should have remembered this when selecting the paper to do!!]

I have now posted a scan of a paper copy of the layout which hopefully is a decent compromise between file size and resolution]]> https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=291 Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:21:18 +0000 sugavanam nagarajan]]> https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=291
-Sugavanam]]>
-Sugavanam]]> https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=283 Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:33:56 +0000 apparao_medapati]]> https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=283
I have tried point CT for 2004 layout.

Sorry, Now file is atttached.

Kindly review.


Thanks & Regards,
Appa Rao.M]]>
I have tried point CT for 2004 layout.

Sorry, Now file is atttached.

Kindly review.


Thanks & Regards,
Appa Rao.M]]> https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=84 Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:30:25 +0000 alexgoei]]> https://irse.signalpost.org/showthread.php?tid=84
Appended please find my answer for the 2004 Exam Point Control table question.

I would appreciate it if I may have your comments or the comments of anyone else on this forum.

Thank you]]>
Appended please find my answer for the 2004 Exam Point Control table question.

I would appreciate it if I may have your comments or the comments of anyone else on this forum.

Thank you]]>