Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Q6 from 2012 paper
#5
Good Morning, thank you for your replies. Within the assumptions we added that we would be using UK signalling and interlocking principles, this was intended to address Huddersfield and Lime street controls, so within the answer we concentrated around the risks outside of these interlocking controls. Should we have been more specific in our assumptions in order for the examiner to understand that we were concentrating on the risks that still exist even with certain interlocking controls being applied?Additionally, the other risks you mentioned were valid, but we found once we started digging, we came up with a lot of hazards and mitigations for the risk stated, and this consumed all of our time. Should we have spread our time out over alternative risks, or would concentrating on one suffice, in order to gain necessary points. ThanksTF Wrote:wealdbrook
Thought of another issue to be considered - the second train is longer than the available platform leading to either operational challenges or passengers attempting to disembark outside the platform.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Q6 from 2012 paper - by tfly86 - 15-08-2019, 02:52 PM
RE: Q6 from 2012 paper - by tfly86 - 15-08-2019, 02:55 PM
RE: Q6 from 2012 paper - by wealdbrook - 15-08-2019, 04:36 PM
RE: Q6 from 2012 paper - by wealdbrook - 16-08-2019, 08:39 AM
RE: Q6 from 2012 paper - by tfly86 - 19-08-2019, 08:14 AM
RE: Q6 from 2012 paper - by wealdbrook - 29-08-2019, 09:07 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)