Sorry, in the host of things to do I find that I overlooked this one. I'll get onto it when I get a chance but in the meantime here are my comments in the attachment on another one received recently.
Be aware that it isn't possible for me to spend enough time to check in all regards all attempts and so some things may pass me by when looking at an effort. Other times it may be that I actually only choose to point out the more important errors and adjust level according to the overall quality of that which received- the better it is, the more detailed the check and pickiness of comments.
I feel that it is more important for me to point areas that indicate a systematic lack of understanding or suggest a way of improving presentation generically than to detect every lack of perfection for a specific layout. The aim is to help students in the exam which is to come and therefore concentrating on the broad themes is more relevant than comparing with a particular model answer- obviously if there are a number of "oversight" issues arising then this may be indicative of why someone might lose marks in exam and so show "a leak that should be be plugged", but from an education perspective these are of less importance for this Forum than those items that betray a lack of understanding. The former are "random faults" whereas the latter are "systematic" and if not corrected the individual will do reliably exactly the same wrong thing in the the exam.
Be aware that it isn't possible for me to spend enough time to check in all regards all attempts and so some things may pass me by when looking at an effort. Other times it may be that I actually only choose to point out the more important errors and adjust level according to the overall quality of that which received- the better it is, the more detailed the check and pickiness of comments.
I feel that it is more important for me to point areas that indicate a systematic lack of understanding or suggest a way of improving presentation generically than to detect every lack of perfection for a specific layout. The aim is to help students in the exam which is to come and therefore concentrating on the broad themes is more relevant than comparing with a particular model answer- obviously if there are a number of "oversight" issues arising then this may be indicative of why someone might lose marks in exam and so show "a leak that should be be plugged", but from an education perspective these are of less importance for this Forum than those items that betray a lack of understanding. The former are "random faults" whereas the latter are "systematic" and if not corrected the individual will do reliably exactly the same wrong thing in the the exam.
(14-07-2014, 06:32 AM)asrisaku Wrote: Dear Railway Signal Engineers
I have just done the aspect sequence year 2008. I studied dorothy's attempt and I found out some need more clarification.
161
it should have shown Y+JI1 and G+JI1
Transition from 3 to 4 aspect
Route 161-165, 149-157, 143-157 might be wrong. I am not sure. Please help clarify.
Also I don't understand that why sugavanam did not show the signal 149.
Any comments on my attempt? Please help.
PJW