Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2006 Cts on 2012 IRSE tables
#7
Probably best to explain some of my reasoning so its easy for you to correct it, when I had the first attempt at 171A(M) I resoned that if the signaller had keyed 225N and 228R the route would set up to 225B.

Therefore 122C(S) to 138 signal would conflict with the route, i reasoned it would therefore be appropriate to have 122C(S) normal and free of sectional locking or the train timed to a stand at CP tc, my reasoning is there could a movement into the goods yard from 142 at the same time the route is set from 171 and at the same time there is a shunting movement from 122 to 138.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
2006 Cts on 2012 IRSE tables - by dorothy.pipet - 15-07-2013, 08:16 AM
RE: 2006 Cts on 2012 IRSE tables - by PJW - 16-07-2013, 06:03 AM
RE: 2006 Cts on 2012 IRSE tables - by PJW - 19-07-2013, 05:51 AM
RE: 2006 Cts on 2012 IRSE tables - by PJW - 16-07-2013, 12:17 PM
RE: 2006 Cts on 2012 IRSE tables - by PJW - 04-08-2014, 08:00 PM
RE: 2006 Cts on 2012 IRSE tables - by StrongLifts5x5 - 30-07-2014, 09:40 AM
RE: 2006 Cts on 2012 IRSE tables - by PJW - 04-08-2014, 08:11 PM
RE: 2006 Cts on 2012 IRSE tables - by PJW - 05-08-2014, 06:17 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)