Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2005 Module 2 Layout Calculations
#24
Please see attached commented version.
I think these are pretty much what you should do in the exam, the couple of arithmetical slips are of little consequence.
Slightly marred by feeling the need to think about freight and the decision to use the longest acceptable 3 aspect spacing to demonstrate the headway was achievable and then finding that it barely was (or actually not achievable given correction of the maths!).


(05-04-2014, 03:55 PM)dorothy.pipet Wrote: Herewith, my attempt at the 2005 Calculations for Mainline. Comments please?
PJW
Reply


Messages In This Thread
2005 Module 2 Layout Calculations - by sidshekhar - 31-07-2009, 02:47 PM
RE: 2005 Module 2 Layout Calculations - by PJW - 03-08-2009, 08:01 PM
RE: 2005 Module 2 Layout Calculations - by Peter - 03-08-2009, 09:19 PM
RE: 2005 Module 2 Layout Calculations - by Peter - 29-05-2010, 09:13 AM
RE: 2005 Module 2 Layout Calculations - by PJW - 01-06-2010, 06:03 PM
RE: 2005 Module 2 Layout Calculations - by Peter - 07-06-2010, 07:46 PM
RE: 2005 Module 2 Layout Calculations - by PJW - 20-06-2010, 07:00 PM
RE: 2005 Module 2 Layout Calculations - by Peter - 22-06-2010, 09:52 PM
RE: 2005 Module 2 Layout Calculations - by PJW - 07-04-2014, 07:33 AM
2005 Module 2 layout calculation - by NJK - 27-08-2012, 05:26 AM
RE: 2005 Module 2 layout calculation - by PJW - 28-01-2013, 03:43 PM
RE: 2005 Module 2 layout calculation - by PJW - 28-01-2013, 03:43 PM
RE: 2005 Module 2 layout calculation - by PJW - 29-01-2013, 08:42 AM
RE: 2005 Module 2 layout calculation - by PJW - 29-01-2013, 01:34 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)