25-09-2012, 05:31 PM
(24-09-2012, 09:46 PM)PJW Wrote: I don't think that you and I are actually disagreeing about what the exam SHOULD be; indeed I think we very much share the same opinion.
Where we differ, is our view about what the examiners are ACTUALLY looking for, which we can only surmise from the little indications which are given.
I base what I wrote on what has been said at Exam Reviews and indeed by the examiners when I was attempting to write the Study Pack. In several respects I feel that their expectations are frozen in time, but having this insight it seems reasonable to let candidates know my estimation of where the marks are.
(24-09-2012, 10:24 AM)reuben Wrote: I must confess that I have a difference of opinion here over the provision of AWS and TPWS on your layout.
Reuben
Sorry Peter, I had overlooked that you've got some extra steer upon the areas of interest from the examiners. In this context your advice to relegate AWS and TPWS to the poor-relations box is perfectly correct. If only the question said so....!
Reuben