Poll: What do you find to be the useful content?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
The signalled layout itself
25.00%
8 25.00%
The explanation of the process of undertaking
21.88%
7 21.88%
The discussion of the various options
15.63%
5 15.63%
The information re the technicalities
15.63%
5 15.63%
The information re the operational use of layout
21.88%
7 21.88%
Total 32 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2002 Mainline Layout answer
#5
Haven't got access right now to my plan, so will respond later re detail.

However the treadles needed for an AHBC are:
1. For the outer strike in, which as you say could need to be inhibited if there is a signal within this area that then could require to have delayed clearance applied.
2. To detect a SPAD (to back-up the TC occupation) at such a signal
3. Treadles either side of the road crossing in order to determine directionality of the train and to rasie the crossing afterwards
4. Strike-in for a "wrong direction" train (as per 1 but generally placed at lesser distance to reflect the lower speed for moves in the abnormal direction)


(20-09-2012, 12:56 PM)savitha kandasamy Wrote: Hi PJW,
with reference to your 2002 solved layout, I have one query. For upbranch, AHBC has a treadle placed near to SIP(40 sec).. My understanding is that, if a signal happens to be placed within the striking distance, the signal is approach released (delayed clearance control). But I am not able to understand the need for one more treadle near signal G38. Kindly clarify.
PJW
Reply


Messages In This Thread
2002 Mainline Layout answer - by PJW - 20-04-2008, 06:09 PM
RE: Mainline Layout 2002 - by adikarina - 21-04-2008, 10:27 AM
RE: Mainline Layout 2002 - by PJW - 21-04-2008, 01:02 PM
RE: Mainline Layout 2002 - by savitha kandasamy - 20-09-2012, 12:56 PM
RE: Mainline Layout 2002 - by PJW - 20-09-2012, 04:22 PM
RE: Mainline Layout 2002 - by PJW - 20-09-2012, 09:45 PM
RE: 2002 Mainline Layout answer - by laz07 - 22-07-2014, 01:38 PM
RE: 2002 Mainline Layout answer - by asrisaku - 23-07-2014, 06:07 AM
RE: 2002 Mainline Layout answer - by laz07 - 24-07-2014, 10:10 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)