Poll: Would you use the IRSE suggested Control Table format?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Am likely to use the recommended format
72.22%
13 72.22%
Would prefer to use my own style with which familiar
22.22%
4 22.22%
Wouldn't attempt a CT question anyway
5.56%
1 5.56%
Total 18 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
CT Format- IRSE Recommended
#10
(10-08-2011, 09:42 PM)PJW Wrote: I'll try to look at your Control Tables by the weekend.
Regarding your query, which I hope I have understood correctly.......

I am as sure as I can be that the pair of blanks we have placed in a different thread (Peter has placed a link to it from higher up in this thread) are the ones you will get in October.

Point type: these are similar to the design of yours (I could not actually read all your headings- it looked to me like: Required Routes & SRL Normal which I am guessing means "Sectional Route Locking") so I think this is not a problem for you.

Signal route and aspect type: yes it is complete, there is no extra sheet. It is very different to current or recent Network Rail type.
It has been reduced just to have the minimum entries which the IRSE think are the most valuable. Therefore many of the boxes that you may be expecting are not there; do remember to use the comments/ remarks columns for the oddities you need to show but for which there is no specific column in this design.

It is arranged in columns so that multiple routes can be placed in separate rows on the same sheet. This helps save time particularly when doing the M W and C classes of the same fundamental route.

Remember that you do not have to use it; you may take blank sheets of your own preferred design.


Just thought that you might be meaning something else-
Perhaps one cause of your confusion is that I believe that in at least some railways in India, there is may be no separate point Control Table and that somehow the information is shown on the Control Table for the route / signal instead. It may be that it is this information that you think is missing- the holding of the points by the routes is shown in the UK on the points CT, whereas the route/signal aspect CT only lists those points that are checked for availability before the route is able to set.


If I have not answered your question correctly, please ask again with additional words to explain your query.

(10-08-2011, 01:21 PM)SARVESH KUMAR Wrote: Sir,
please, recmonded draft control table are complete table are you sure because i am confuse with point control table and route control table
please urgently clerified, so i am preparation with draft control table

with regards
sarvesh kumar

Sir,

My question only for IRSE exam if i am written question for control table as per indian practice one route/ signal to destination & answer given as per indian practice total information given including ponit set or locked , back lock , route release, approch lock & other control etc and the control table of indian practice is attached here. how marks obtained from 25 if control table is correct including point & route table. otherwise i am written answer as uk practice seprate route control table & point control table

with regards
sarvesh kumar
Reply


Messages In This Thread
CT Format- IRSE Recommended - by PJW - 05-02-2011, 10:41 PM
RE: CT Format- IRSE Recommended - by Peter - 06-02-2011, 12:37 PM
RE: CT Format- IRSE Recommended - by kirandas - 27-07-2011, 03:38 PM
RE: CT Format- IRSE Recommended - by PJW - 27-07-2011, 06:08 PM
RE: CT Format- IRSE Recommended - by Peter - 27-07-2011, 06:32 PM
RE: CT Format- IRSE Recommended - by kirandas - 28-07-2011, 01:12 PM
RE: CT Format- IRSE Recommended - by PJW - 10-08-2011, 09:33 PM
RE: CT Format- IRSE Recommended - by PJW - 10-08-2011, 09:42 PM
RE: CT Format- IRSE Recommended - by SARVESH KUMAR - 11-08-2011, 07:43 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)