(09-09-2010, 10:26 PM)PJW Wrote:(09-09-2010, 05:34 AM)hiteshp Wrote: Some past paper attempts from the brisbane study group.The heading said Q1 & Q5 but only one attachment which is for Q5 only .......
We've done Questions 5 from the 2006 mod1 paper.
Cheers,
Johnson.
Having now been sent the second attachment which is another attempt at this Q5 and one for Q1 in the same paper, I have now printed, commented, scanned and pdf'd to attach in this thread and the other relevant thread .
==========================================================================
Two sides is certainly rather brief for a 30 minute question; however I guess that for the 2010 exam when have to do 3 questions in the hour then this would be about as much as could be expected- perhaps you were practicing with this end in view.
Gives reasonably good first impression since it is clearly legible, clear which part is being answered, concise, compact without woffle. Probably have benefited from being laid out with more space; page 2 better than page 1 in this regard.
Good that at start stated Queensland Rail practices; but a fuller sentence to give overview summary of environment would have been useful.
Part a
Asked for the competence requirements and hence identify roles; answer gave job roles and described their contributions to the committee. Obviously very much
PJW