Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Answer to 2005 Part A Q1
#5
1 146C(M) routes to Down Main, but it requires 210A R, so is it still the opposing signal of 107? I feel I do not know the exact definition of opposing signal? It seems there is an overlap locking,is it overlap locking between 146C(M) and 107?

2 I remember in indirect route locking, if signal-A is parallel with another signal-B, and they have the same exit, then if B is direct opposing signal of signal C, A is indirect opposing of C. So, I think in 146A(M), 131B(M),131B©,127B(M) need to be route locking. Right or wrong?

3 In 128A(S), why does it need 107A(M) in route locking? I think it does not belong to any of these situation:overlap locking, direct opposing locking, indirect opposing locking....



Reply


Messages In This Thread
Answer to 2005 Part A Q1 - by alexgoei - 25-08-2008, 12:14 PM
RE: Answer to 2005 Part A Q1 - by PJW - 25-08-2008, 03:56 PM
RE: Answer to 2005 Part A Q1 - by PJW - 01-09-2008, 11:39 AM
RE: Answer to 2005 Part A Q1 - by PJW - 02-09-2008, 10:47 AM
RE: Answer to 2005 Part A Q1 - by greensky52 - 16-09-2010, 04:32 PM
RE: Answer to 2005 Part A Q1 - by PJW - 16-09-2010, 08:24 PM
RE: Answer to 2005 Part A Q1 - by greensky52 - 17-09-2010, 02:03 PM
RE: Answer to 2005 Part A Q1 - by PJW - 17-09-2010, 02:10 PM
RE: Answer to 2005 Part A Q1 - by greensky52 - 17-09-2010, 02:35 PM
RE: Answer to 2005 Part A Q1 - by PJW - 17-09-2010, 08:36 PM
RE: Answer to 2005 Part A Q1 - by greensky52 - 18-09-2010, 12:02 PM
RE: Answer to 2005 Part A Q1 - by PJW - 18-09-2010, 03:45 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)