Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 2 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2007 Q4 CROSS-ACCEPTANCE
#10
(03-09-2010, 12:46 AM)losler Wrote: Hi

The Brisbane study group also attempted this question

Cheers!

Laura, Hitesh and Johnson

Added some comment in your text.

Generally a good approach and presentation, but some similarity with Aditi's answer in that you weren't specifically concentrating on cross-acceptance but some was more general, being related to the use of a product from one environment in another one. Hence suggest that you also read the various comments made on her attempt.

I guess marks would be something like 3 +2 + 5 + 4 = 14 so a comfortable pass and had you been a bit more convincincing that you really understood what cross-acceptance is really all about then it wouldn't have taken much more to have got a credit.
PJW
Reply


Messages In This Thread
2007 Q4 CROSS-ACCEPTANCE - by adikarina - 13-07-2008, 06:45 PM
RE: cross-acceptance - by Peter - 14-07-2008, 08:01 PM
RE: cross-acceptance - by PJW - 18-07-2008, 06:16 AM
RE: cross-acceptance - by Peter - 20-07-2008, 07:33 PM
RE: cross-acceptance - by Jerry1237 - 28-07-2008, 02:29 PM
RE: cross-acceptance Q - by bigcheese - 31-03-2009, 12:26 PM
RE: cross-acceptance Q - by Ozo - 07-04-2009, 05:12 AM
RE: cross-acceptance Q - by bigcheese - 07-04-2009, 01:30 PM
RE: CROSS ACCEPTANCE - by losler - 03-09-2010, 12:46 AM
RE: CROSS ACCEPTANCE - by PJW - 03-09-2010, 10:20 PM
RE: CROSS ACCEPTANCE - by PJW - 14-09-2011, 05:55 AM
RE: CROSS ACCEPTANCE - by dorothy.pipet - 02-05-2016, 05:09 PM
RE: CROSS ACCEPTANCE - by PJW - 09-05-2016, 12:39 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)