Some further answers which were prepared to the 2009 paper for potential use at the event:
Q1 was an attempt to fully address the question but also with the intention of making the end product useful for people learning about the subject and hence rather more explanatory than could be achieved in exam conditions.
Q5 was an attempt to fully address the question in a manner that would be appropriate for the Exam; however it soon became evident that it'd take much longer than the allotted time. Since not in exam conditions decided to complete anyway and then decide what ought to have been cut; I am still at a loss to understand what could have been missed out without losing marks. A question to avoid in the exam I think; however can others see how to have answered more economicallly whilst still addressing the full question?
Q1 was an attempt to fully address the question but also with the intention of making the end product useful for people learning about the subject and hence rather more explanatory than could be achieved in exam conditions.
Q5 was an attempt to fully address the question in a manner that would be appropriate for the Exam; however it soon became evident that it'd take much longer than the allotted time. Since not in exam conditions decided to complete anyway and then decide what ought to have been cut; I am still at a loss to understand what could have been missed out without losing marks. A question to avoid in the exam I think; however can others see how to have answered more economicallly whilst still addressing the full question?
PJW